The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented: Instrument Bank for Educators and Researchers

Fall 2005 Headmast


E. Jean Gubbins
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT

There is a great quote by Frank Kingdon: “Questions are the creative acts of intelligence.” Asking the right questions makes the process of seeking answers easier because it becomes a focused journey. Educators and researchers always ask questions as they work with students, plan lessons, create theories, or design experiments. They want to know how students respond to curricula, what influences the achievement of gifted and talented students with learning disabilities, or how parents view academic programs and services. Throughout the design and implementation of The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (NRC/GT) research agenda, “question asking” and “question-seeking” were central to the process. We posed questions about identification, programming, professional development, special populations of students with abilities and disabilities, achievement and underachievement, classroom practices, and policies and procedures related to the education of gifted and talented children. These and other potential research topics emerged from the only federal legislation supporting gifted and talented education, Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act, priorities set by the United States Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences, and two NRC/GT national needs assessments that tapped into suggestions from educators, researchers, and the larger education community. As we developed research questions and designed quantitative and qualitative students, we recognized the need to ensure that instruments were reliable, valid, responsive to specific research questions, and modes of data collection. There were many excellent published instruments reviewed in Buros Mental Measurements Yearbooks (2003), Tests in Print (1999), and Tests (2003). Our experiences with using potential instruments and knowledge of technical qualities helped us with the decision-making process. Sometimes, we had many options for instruments; other times, options were limited. Therefore, we designed instruments for administrators, teachers, students, and parents that required observations, reflections, closed-ended and open-ended responses, demographic data, and work samples. All created instruments were accessible through NRC/GT research monographs that detailed all phases of research studies. We received many requests for access to and use of NRC/GT instruments and always granted permission. Instruments were used to replicate studies, conduct Master’s and dissertation theses, assess gifted and talented programs and strategies, and evaluate classroom practices.

NRCGT Instrument Bank Cover page, Catharine F. de Wet, E. Jean Gubbins, Siamak Vahidi, Editors, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, August 2005, IBCD05To enable more people access to instruments, we have created a NRC/GT Instrument Bank on a CD-Rom with 3 sections:

      Section A: Identification
      Section B: Special Populations
      Section C: Classroom Practices

Each section includes the study’s title, abstract, and the resulting implications, guidelines, conclusions, or recommendations. Details about the development of the instruments and reliability and validity studies also are available for many studies. Descriptions of how the instruments were used and suggestions for additional uses that may be appropriate for your own settings are provided.

The research study entitled Extending the Pedagogy of Gifted Education to All Students (Reis, Gentry, & Park, 1995) was designed to determine the impact of gifted education pedagogy with all students through a series of enrichment clusters. Enrichment clusters provide opportunities for students to come together to pursue advanced content through “inductive opportunities for multi-age, cross-grade student participation in open-ended investigations of student interests” (p. v). See recommendations resulting from this study and sample questions from the Enrichment Cluster Student Evaluation. The evaluation form may be used adopted or serve as a prototype for program offerings.

Instrument Bank page 53: Classroom Practices: Extending the Pedagogy of Gifted Education to All Students–Enrichment Cluster Student Evaluation: How this instrument was used: The evaluation form was used in one of two versions: one with K-2 students, and one with grade 3–6 students. The forms were used to elicit information from students about their experiences in enrichment clusters and their suggestions for improving future clusters. Possible uses: These evaluation forms can be used together feedback from students about enrichment clusters, or maybe modified to gather feedback about other program offerings.The NRC/GT Instrument Bank is a resource for your own questions about identifying and serving gifted and talented students. It also offers many prototypes for designing your own instruments responsive to local programs and services. It may be time to pose your own research and evaluation questions and the Instrument Bank will help you start the journey as you seek answers.

Reference
Maddox, T. (Ed.). (2003). Tests: A comprehensive reference for assessments in psychology, education, and business (5th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Murphy, L. L., Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.). (1999). Tests in print (Vols. I & II). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Plake, B. S., Impara, J. C., & Spies, R. A. (Eds.). (2003). The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

 

Instrument Bank page 74: Enrichment Cluster Student Evaluation K-2: Grade: _____ Cluster Name; ______________ We would like to know how you feel about your experiences in your Enrichment Cluster. Please read each statement carefully and circle the face that shows how you feel about each statement. A happy face means that you agree with the statement. A face that is neither happy nor sad means that you are not sure how you feel about the statement. A sad face means that you disagree with the statement. 1. I liked my cluster. Agree Disagree 2. I learned new things in my cluster. Agree Disagree 3. My cluster teacher was interesting. Agree Disagree 4. I would like to be in an Enrichment Cluster again. Agree Disagree

 

Back to Newsletter Articles Page